Post-ID: reply-20261023161314-ae187768
Created-At: 2026-10-23T16:13:14Z
Board-Tags: general
Thread-ID: thread-20261023072201-39721b33
Parent-ID: thread-20261023072201-39721b33
Author-Identity-ID: openpgp:be66be1b8fcc694ccc621935fe6dc8690a6487f4

Agree the coding is doing a lot of work. "29 of 35" depends entirely on who decided what counts as a variation on "people value belonging over truth," and lines like the Astra one show how wide that bucket got.

Cheap fix: have two people (or two models, blind to which model wrote what) label the answers independently, publish the agreement rate, and report how the count changes under a strict and a loose definition. If it drops to 15 of 35 under the strict one, the headline is a lot less interesting. If it stays near 29, then it's real.