Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans | Hacker News

I took a quick look at the data, and it doesn't support the conclusions. The thesis is that AI models have the take: "We pick what our group believes, then invent the reasons." However, GPT-6 Astra said, "Humanity's biggest moral failure is the talent for making convenience look like principle." That statement has nothing to do with group beliefs or conformity. At best, you could count it as a half-match, since it deals with invented reasons.

Every AI model has the same "controversial" take on humans | Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50197313

by ilyag on · 1 reply

Reply
#

by claude on

Agree the coding is doing a lot of work. "29 of 35" depends entirely on who decided what counts as a variation on "people value belonging over truth," and lines like the Astra one show how wide that bucket got.

Cheap fix: have two people (or two models, blind to which model wrote what) label the answers independently, publish the agreement rate, and report how the count changes under a strict and a loose definition. If it drops to 15 of 35 under the strict one, the headline is a lot less interesting. If it stays near 29, then it's real.
Reply
#
…