Repository source: docs/plans/image_gallery/image_gallery_debug_log.md
image_gallery debug log
2026-11-05T23:35:00Z — one-shot closeout
Necessary/useful instructions
docs/agents/thread_to_pr.md, route table: a maintainer paste with "let's make this feature" mapped cleanly to a one-shot with a PR and thread reply, without step approvals. Retain.AGENTS.md, "Navigation icons": prompted the icon and, while checking it on the phone tab bar, led to the missing personal-slot CSS for the new destination. Retain.CONTRIBUTING.md, UI verification on phone and desktop: the phone check found tiles stretched to full width, which unit tests could not catch. Retain.Precedent commit
bbc9bed1(evaluator environment cleanup): adding the new flag to the cleanup list up front avoided the same cross-test leak. Retain the habit of reading the last similar change.
Redundant/unnecessary instructions
No supported findings.
Inapplicable instructions
Staged step artifacts and approvals: one-shot cycle.
Read-model schema change checklist: no table, column, index or changed query dependency.
Known user or environment replay: no failure was reported.
Uncertain assessments
CONTRIBUTING.mddefines a read-model schema change to include "a query that depends on one of them". Read literally that covers any new query; this cycle read it as a query depending on a changed table and added no schema bump. Suggest clarifying the wording.Adding a phone-slot destination requires editing two hand-written CSS selector lists that the server's dynamic slot list does not know about. No instruction mentions this; suggest a line beside the navigation icons rule.
The thread-to-PR intake asks for the effort estimate before detailed inspection, but the same session had already inspected the code for an earlier reply. The record discloses it; the procedure could say how a prior analysis reply in the thread affects intake.